Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ai-agent-channel

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A coordination layer for coding agents that provides memorable identities, inbox/outbox messaging, searchable message history, and file lease management to prevent conflicts. Uses Git for human-auditable artifacts and SQLite for fast queries, enabling multiple agents to collaborate across projects without stepping on each other.
      41
      2,175
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding-agent sessions on the same machine to collaborate locally and durably by exchanging requests, replies, and task results through an authenticated loopback server with SQLite-backed storage, joined via CLI or an MCP stdio bridge. It also handles message delivery by priority and wait time, deduplicates idempotent sends, enforces task versioning, and preserves artifacts by content hash.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a mail-like coordination layer for coding agents, enabling them to register identities, exchange messages through inbox/outbox, search threaded history, and declare advisory file reservations to prevent conflicts.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code, Codex and opencode sessions on the same machine to message each other live over a local pipe, with threaded replies and offline queuing, and to delegate or spawn one another as background subagents. Messages persist in SQLite and any running server can take over as broker, so peers stay reachable without a daemon.
      25 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 41 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions, and the extensive descriptions help differentiate them. However, there is some potential confusion among list_messages vs search_messages, resolve_message vs confirm_resolution vs reopen_message, and open_obligations vs ready_work vs awaiting_ack.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case, but the pattern is inconsistent: many are verb_noun (send_message, delete_message, create_channel), while others are noun_action (pin_set, pin_get, pin_history) or noun_noun (message_history, channel_status), and one is verb-only (acknowledge). This mixed convention is still readable but not predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 41 tools, the server is far beyond the typical 3-15 well-scoped range and above the 25+ threshold. While each tool has a distinct purpose, the large surface includes niche utilities (backfill_superseded, undo_backfill, get_charter_template) and 6 admin-only tools, making the set heavy and potentially overwhelming for an agent.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core domain well: messaging lifecycle, obligations, decisions/pins, content upload, role administration, search, and polling. Minor gaps exist, such as no remove_role, no editing of non-proposal messages (only revise for proposals), and addenda only at send time, but these are workable and do not block main workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues