neo4j-mcp-gateway
Related Servers
Alternatives to neo4j-mcp-gateway
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA thin stdio gateway to Nodus's Streamable HTTP MCP server, exposing a curated allowlist of tools for the Research Workbench. It enables secure, bearer-authenticated interactions with Nodus without graph logic or caching.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA lightweight MCP gateway that aggregates multiple MCP services into a unified stdio interface, automatically prefixing tool names with the service name to avoid conflicts.14 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA zero-dependency MCP gateway: host your own tools, forward and curate tools from other MCP servers, expose them leanly to cut agent token cost, and gate every call through your own policy hooks before it runs.413 npm37MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP gateway and offline catalog CLI that aggregates multiple upstream MCP servers into a single stdio endpoint, and provides tool recommendation and catalog inspection without connecting to upstreams.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, quarantine security, Docker isolation, OAuth support, activity logging, and web UI. Routes multiple upstream MCP servers through a single endpoint.9377MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceTurns any CLI command into an MCP server via a declarative YAML config, enabling safe, typed tool execution with no shell injection.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool addresses a distinctly different use case: synthetic identity detection, movie search, and high-risk transaction analysis. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their intended purposes.
All tools share the consistent 'usecase_' prefix, but the action part varies: 'detect', 'search', and a noun phrase 'high_risk_transactions' (no verb). This mix of verb_noun and noun-only patterns is somewhat inconsistent.
With only 3 tools, the set is on the low side for a Neo4j gateway that could plausibly support many graph operations. It feels like a small demo set rather than a comprehensive service, but it is not absurdly thin.
The tools are a random assortment of curated use cases with no clear domain coverage. There is no general query, write, or management capability, and the movie search seems unrelated to fraud/AML use cases, leaving significant gaps for any given purpose.