Skip to main content
Glama
jefferyleo

ezverify-mcp

by jefferyleo
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to ezverify-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • kluno-verify-mcp

      Kuldip99123
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code or Claude Desktop to verify whether email addresses are deliverable, returning status, sub-status, reason, confidence, and metadata.
      1
      5 npm
      ISC

    • InboxValid MCP Server

      aayusharmaaa
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables email address verification through a single MCP tool, returning whether an address is valid, invalid, or risky.
      1
      -
    • truelist-mcp by Truelist-Labs

      truelist-mcpofficial

      Truelist-Labs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to validate individual or batch email addresses for deliverability, and to check account plan information, through MCP tools.
      3
      44 npm
      MIT
    • smtping-mcp by smtping

      smtping-mcpofficial

      smtping
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Email Verification MCP: Verify email addresses, clean lists up to 100,000 addresses and check spamtrap, disposable, spambot and complainer lists from Claude, Cursor or VS Code.
      239 npm
      2
      MIT

    • email-verify

      Baneado98
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables real-time email verification via MCP tools, checking syntax, MX, disposable domains, and optional SMTP probe to determine deliverability with a VALID/RISKY/INVALID verdict.
      2
      9 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: single verification, bulk submission, bulk status polling, historical usage stats, and account/credit information. The descriptions explicitly clarify the boundary between get_usage_stats and get_account_info, avoiding likely confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use consistent snake_case with an action-oriented verb and clear noun phrase (verify_email, verify_emails_bulk, get_bulk_job_status, get_usage_stats, get_account_info). The pattern is predictable throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools are well-scoped for an email verification service, covering both single and bulk workflows plus account and usage visibility. No tool feels redundant or excessive.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: single verification, bulk job submission, bulk job status retrieval, usage reporting, and account/credit information. No obvious operational dead end is present for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources