F
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables asynchronous and parallel execution of Claude Code tasks across multiple sessions, allowing users to start background tasks and continue working immediately without blocking.
1
-
codex-mcp-async
Related Servers
Alternatives to codex-mcp-async
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to delegate tasks to OpenAI's Codex CLI (GPT-5.4) with structured execution traces, parallel execution, session persistence, and adversarial code review.15MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Codex to delegate tasks to Claude Code, allowing Claude to investigate, edit, and verify changes in the repository with background job management.0MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Codex to offload expensive code reading, editing, and checking to a worker agent via Claude Code, supporting async jobs and long-running tasks.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables asynchronous and parallel execution of Gemini CLI tasks within Claude Code, allowing background task management and multi-instance parallelism.34MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Science to delegate independent review or implementation tasks to the official OpenAI Codex CLI via an asynchronous queue, avoiding one-minute time limits and sandbox issues.MIT
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool serves a distinct purpose: synchronous execution, async execution, and result checking. No overlap exists between these operations.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools start with 'codex_', but there is a slight inconsistency: 'codex_execute' lacks a 'sync' modifier while its async counterpart has it, and 'codex_check_result' uses a noun phrase. Still, the pattern is mostly predictable.
Tool Count4/5
With only 3 tools, the server is minimal but appropriately scoped for its purpose of providing both sync and async code execution with result retrieval.
Completeness3/5
The core execution and result checking are covered, but missing features like cancelling async tasks or listing pending tasks create minor gaps in the lifecycle.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues