Aseprite Asset MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Aseprite Asset MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for programmatically creating and editing Aseprite sprites, enabling AI agents to draw, manage layers and frames, and iterate until the desired result is achieved.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Aseprite — create, edit, and export pixel art sprites, animations, and sprite sheets from any AI assistant.437MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI agents draw in a live Aseprite editor or headless mode, featuring one-action Unity sprite-sheet export, art-QA sweeps, and game-dev tools.76 PyPI7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI agents create, edit, and animate pixel-art sprites, with PNG previews after every step and support for export to GIF/APNG/spritesheets.45,854 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI agents create and edit Aseprite sprites headlessly, enabling pixel art, animation, and export via 98 tools.10010MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for safe local automation of Aseprite, providing tools to create, inspect, edit, save, and export pixel art documents through the official Aseprite CLI and controlled Lua scripts.-
TDQS
Scored across 185 tools
Many tools perform nearly the same operation with small variations, such as draw_pixels/draw_pixels_at, adjust_hsl/adjust_hsl_native, apply_dither_gradient/apply_dither_pattern, and numerous generate_*_pack/compose_*_scene generators. The descriptions help, but the boundaries are not obvious from names alone, so an agent can easily pick the wrong variant.
The overwhelming majority of tools use a readable snake_case verb_noun pattern (create_canvas, export_sprite, get_palette, set_frame_duration), and _at suffixes consistently mark layer/frame-targeted variants. Minor exceptions like server_capabilities, animation_workflow_guide, and outline_native break the pattern but do not obscure the overall scheme.
185 tools is far beyond a well-scoped MCP surface; even a comprehensive Aseprite workflow does not need this many first-class entry points. This is an extreme count that will force agents to spend excessive tokens and effort on tool selection.
The surface is unusually broad: document/layer/frame/cel editing, palettes, tilemaps, text, slices, animation, exports, batch jobs, and procedural asset generation are all covered. Minor lifecycle gaps such as no explicit document save/close/delete and only validated onion-skin settings remain, but run_lua_script and export tools provide workarounds.