cleanshot_self_timer

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It only says 'Open' and 'with self-timer' without disclosing behavioral traits such as the duration of the timer, what happens after the capture, or any side effects. The action parameter is not mentioned, leaving key behavior undisclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded with the action and resource. However, its brevity borders on under-specification, which prevents a perfect score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (one optional parameter, no output schema), so the description is not grossly inadequate. Still, it omits context about the self-timer's behavior (e.g., configurable delay) and does not reference the action parameter, leaving room for improvement.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (the action parameter has a description 'Action to perform after capture'), so baseline is 3. The tool description adds no additional meaning about the parameter, so it neither improves nor degrades the schema's clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Open') and resource ('CleanShot's Capture Area mode with self-timer'), clearly distinguishing this tool from siblings like cleanshot_capture_area. However, it does not elaborate on what the self-timer does (e.g., delay before capture), so it is clear but not fully explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage through the name and phrase 'with self-timer', suggesting it is for delayed area captures. No explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives (e.g., immediate capture tools) or when not to use it is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.