get_talks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations; description only states 'list of talks' without disclosing read-only nature, pagination behavior, or side effects. Schema covers parameters but description lacks behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with key action and resource, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has 10 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations; description is too brief to cover filtering combinations, return format, or pagination details given the complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so description not required to add meaning. The description mentions 'optional filtering and pagination' but does not explain specific parameters beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Get a list of talks' with verb and resource, and mentions optional filtering/pagination. Distinct from sibling tools like get_posts and get_videos.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for listing talks, but no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternatives provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.