solana-auditor
Related Servers
Alternatives to solana-auditor
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to run pre-signature security checks: identifying who can replace a Solana program's code or control an EVM contract's upgrades, surfacing dependency advisories for lockfiles, scanning public repos before release, and setting 30-day signed-webhook alerts on changes. Calls are paid per use in USDC over x402 from a wallet with per-call caps and a session budget.858 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and CLI users to run automated bytecode security audits of EVM smart contracts on Base Mainnet, detecting risky opcodes and interface signatures, scoring risk, and unlocking verified results via x402 USDC micropayments.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible agents to submit source code for automated SAST/SCA security audits paid via x402 USDC micropayments on Base, returning structured vulnerability findings, CWE IDs, and optional remediated code patches.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables paid, per-request access to raw on-chain token security data (honeypot, taxes, holders, liquidity) on Arc mainnet via x402 payments, without scores or advice.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables static security audit of Solidity smart contracts by analyzing source code or deployed bytecode for vulnerabilities, providing risk scores and detailed findings.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables static auditing of EVM Solidity smart contracts to detect critical vulnerabilities such as reentrancy state changes, unhandled external calls, unchecked delegatecall, and tx.origin authentication flaws, producing risk audit reports.7-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one audits Solana code, the other generates payment invoices. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (audit_solana_code, get_payment_invoice), making the naming predictable and clear.
With only two tools, the server feels thin. The payment invoice tool is tangential to the core auditing purpose, making the tool count borderline for the stated domain.
The audit surface is minimal with only a single audit operation, lacking supporting features like audit history or status retrieval. The inclusion of payment invoicing is odd and doesn't fill functional gaps in the auditing workflow.