solana-auditor
Related Servers
Alternatives to solana-auditor
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables paid, per-request access to raw on-chain token security data (honeypot, taxes, holders, liquidity) on Arc mainnet via x402 payments, without scores or advice.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables static security audit of Solidity smart contracts by analyzing source code or deployed bytecode for vulnerabilities, providing risk scores and detailed findings.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to scan code for security vulnerabilities before execution, supporting Python and JavaScript/TypeScript with deterministic AST-based analysis and optional Solana micropayments.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceChecks token contract safety for honeypot, tax, proxy, blacklist, ownership risks, and returns a risk score, enabling rug-pull protection for agents via pay-per-call x402 micropayments.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAgent payments ecosystem intelligence. Scans GitHub, Hacker News, and npm for activity across AP2, ACP, x402, MPP, and UCP protocols. Returns scored and classified opportunities. Free protocol info and comparison, paid scan via x402 USDC339 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access Solana wallet analytics, token data, and DeFi tools via pay-per-request USDC micropayments using the x402 protocol, without API keys or subscriptions.1328 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one audits Solana code, the other generates payment invoices. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (audit_solana_code, get_payment_invoice), making the naming predictable and clear.
With only two tools, the server feels thin. The payment invoice tool is tangential to the core auditing purpose, making the tool count borderline for the stated domain.
The audit surface is minimal with only a single audit operation, lacking supporting features like audit history or status retrieval. The inclusion of payment invoicing is odd and doesn't fill functional gaps in the auditing workflow.