Skip to main content
Glama
jcislo
by jcislo

Related Servers

Alternatives to moltalyzer

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      250+ AI-powered MCP tools: research, write, code, translate, scrape, sentiment, vision, RAG, agent memory, marketplace, trading signals, and more. 15 models across 7 providers. Pay-per-use via API key or x402 USDC micropayments.
      114 PyPI
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access professional crypto market intelligence via 8 MCP tools, covering market regime, fear/greed, funding rates, DeFi yields, token signals, wallet risk, and contract audits. Backed by real-time data from Binance, DeFiLlama, Etherscan, with both free tools and x402 micropayment options.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes 25 paid API endpoints as MCP tools for AI agents, with payments in USDC on Base mainnet via the x402 protocol, enabling tasks like web search, company intelligence, and crypto research.
      25
      40 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: free samples vs paid live data vs historical for each intelligence domain, with clear differentiation between brief/full/single/batch/detail variants. No two tools appear to do the same thing; even the sample vs digest pairs are explicitly distinguished in descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'get_<domain>_<modifier>' pattern (e.g., get_moltbook_digest, get_token_signals, get_pulse_narratives). Minor inconsistencies exist in singular/plural usage (get_tokens_latest vs get_token_signal) and a few abstract verbs (get_health, get_api_info), but overall the pattern is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    23 tools is slightly over the ideal 3-15 range but justified by the multi-domain coverage (crypto, GitHub, Polymarket, Pulse, meta). Each tool serves a distinct data access need, so the count feels reasonable rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers current data, samples, historical lookbacks for most domains, and batch/single retrieval for signals. Notable gaps include missing historical access for Polymarket and Pulse narratives, and no way to 'list' all available signals beyond pagination in history, but core workflows are still well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive