Skip to main content
Glama
jbolt25
by jbolt25

Related Servers

Alternatives to jules-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM applications to interact with Google's Jules AI coding assistant to manage repositories, coding sessions, and pull requests. It allows users to programmatically create tasks, approve plans, and communicate with the assistant during active coding sessions.
      9
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes Google Jules AI capabilities for automated coding tasks, including session management, code reviews, and unified diff handling. It enables users to create sessions, approve plans, and synchronize AI-generated code changes with GitHub repositories.
      26
      11 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables users to manage Google's Jules AI coding agent sessions directly from MCP-compatible clients. It supports creating sessions, approving execution plans, and interacting with session activity to streamline autonomous coding workflows.
      2 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct actions, but jules_status, jules_activity, and jules_result all retrieve session information and could be confused by an agent. Descriptions clarify granularity, but the boundaries between current state, activities, and full result are not obvious.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a consistent jules_ prefix and use clear, action-oriented names. Some are verb_noun forms like list_sources and approve_plan, while others are single nouns like status and result, creating minor inconsistency but the pattern remains readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for managing Jules coding sessions. Each tool serves a distinct purpose in the workflow without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: list sources, start a session, approve plans, send feedback, and retrieve results. Minor gaps exist such as no explicit cancel/reject tool, but send feedback likely covers redirection or rejection.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues