io.github.jbacalso24/mimry
Related Servers
Alternatives to io.github.jbacalso24/mimry
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI coding assistants with deep, semantic understanding of local codebases via AST-aware chunking, cross-repo symbol graphs, and architectural memory, enabling context-aware code search and dependency tracing.11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceGives AI coding assistants persistent project memory and semantic code search, running fully locally with no API keys required.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceGives coding agents a memory of codebases by searching repositories using semantic similarity and structural call/import graphs, enabling reuse of proven patterns and reducing token usage.61-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to recall past lessons, bugs, and conventions from local git history with sub-5ms latency and full privacy.78 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to semantically search and navigate code repositories using natural language, with support for multiple repos, incremental indexing, and no local install needed.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to search, route, and read code across multiple repositories through a central semantic index, without needing to clone repositories locally.-
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
Several tools occupy overlapping search/context/ranking territory, including find, semantic, related, symbol, path, why, explain, context, route, brief, and preflight. The descriptions clarify some boundaries, but the set still leaves meaningful ambiguity about which retrieval/explanation tool to choose.
All tools use a consistent mimry_ prefix with lower_snake_case naming. The main variation is noun vs. verb forms such as mimry_status, mimry_find, and mimry_plan_tree, but the convention is still readable and predictable.
The server exposes 22 tools, which is heavy for an MCP surface even considering the indexing, routing, and planning scope. It sits in the borderline-heavy range where consolidation or stronger grouping would improve usability.
The toolset covers index lifecycle, search, semantic retrieval, routing, context generation, explanations, feedback, digests, and plan tree operations. Minor gaps may exist around explicit reset/delete or plan mutation, but core workflows appear well represented.