Skip to main content
Glama
jaysinailabs

aperture-mcp

by jaysinailabs
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to aperture-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • openclaw-output-vetter-mcp

      temurkhan13
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for verifying AI agent claims vs reality — single-transcript inline grounding-check that flags when an agent's response states facts not in the input context, when its code silently swallows exceptions and substitutes mock data, or when its multi-turn transcript contains contradictions or unverified completion claims. Sub-second, local, free, no API calls.
      4
      23 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    • SpecLock

      sgroy10
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI Constraint Engine that enforces CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, and AGENTS.md rules as laws. 51 MCP tools for semantic conflict detection, patch review, drift scoring, pre-commit hooks, and Guardian Mode. Catches euphemisms, temporal evasion, and hidden violations that keyword matching misses.
      95 npm
      25
      MIT

    • loop-verify

      akihidem
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that performs independent verification of artifacts against criteria using a different AI model lineage (codex, OpenAI, or Gemini) to catch defects that same-family checks might miss.
      MIT

    • shipcheck-mcp

      noureldeensalama
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI agents to scan code for leaked secrets, copyleft licenses, unprotected routes, missing privacy policies, and risky card handling before committing or shipping.
      61 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Tools are specialized but overlap with the generic `compare` tool, which can also handle stance, commitment, and proposal anchors. The specialized tools add narrow features but cause ambiguity in tool selection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Four tools follow `compare_*` pattern, but `health` breaks the convention. The naming is mostly consistent with one clear outlier.

    Tool Count4/5

    Five tools is slightly below what the domain might warrant (e.g., missing a baseline-specific comparison), but still reasonable and not too few.

    Completeness3/5

    Covers common comparison types but has gaps: missing a dedicated baseline comparison, and each specialized tool ignores certain anchor types. The generic `compare` has strict verbatim matching that may miss semantic equivalences.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources