agenthelm
Related Servers
Alternatives to agenthelm
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceOne local memory every coding agent on your machine shares — Claude Code, Cursor, Claude Desktop, OpenCode. Answers from past sessions, commits, CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md and ADRs with the exact source, and withholds work another agent has claimed so two agents don't rewrite the same thing.431MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePersistent decision memory and contradiction detection for AI coding agents. Enforces architectural consistency across sessions — the agent cannot code until it loads prior decisions. Human resolves conflicts on a dashboard or in chat.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLocal-first shared memory and coordination layer for AI coding agents, with repository evidence, reservations, handoffs, code graph context, and dashboard review backed by PostgreSQL/pgvector.303Apache 2.0
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code agents and sub-agents to share a persistent, compiled memory of project state, decisions, tasks, and facts across sessions instead of re-reading transcripts. Provides token-efficient bootstrap, search, commit, leased task claiming, and task-specific context compilation so parallel agents can coordinate without clobbering each other.50MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceConnects multiple AI agents (Codex, Claude Code, Grok, etc.) into a coordinated, auditable team with shared memory, task ownership, and human oversight, enabling parallel collaboration without conflicts.238Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to share a local-first, versioned memory of decisions, conventions, tasks, conflicts, and handoffs over MCP and REST.1 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation on the Project Brain: retrieval of context, submission of new knowledge, and querying history. There is no overlap in purpose.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (get_context, propose_knowledge, get_history). The repetition of 'get' is acceptable as it indicates retrieval operations.
With only 3 tools, the server is scoped for a focused knowledge management function. While minimal, each tool serves a clear purpose and the count is appropriate for the domain.
The tools cover retrieval, submission, and history, but lack direct update or delete operations for knowledge items. Updates could be handled via new proposals, but that introduces overhead and gaps.