Skip to main content
Glama
javrodriguez

litcheck-mcp

by javrodriguez
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to litcheck-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • clearon-source-audit

      kwgoodwin
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables revision-bound source audits with exact article fingerprinting, claim-to-source mapping, quotation verification, and immutable JSON evidence reports for prepublication review.
      9
      MIT

    • CiteAnything MCP Server

      veriglow
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create verifiable, replayable citations, search private knowledge bases, and publish Markdown with verified citation markers.
      MIT

    • traceable-research-mcp

      jush-website
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables traceable scholarly literature reviews using free APIs, generating reports where every claim links to evidence IDs.
      MIT
    • CiteStamp MCP server by citestamp

      CiteStamp MCP serverofficial

      citestamp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Ground citations before your agent emits them by checking references against public scholarly registries and flagging hallucinated or retracted ones.
      MIT

    • Paper Chaser MCP

      joshuasundance-swca
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to conduct academic research workflows such as paper discovery, literature mapping, citation chasing, author pivots, citation repair, and regulatory or species document retrieval.
      MIT

    • zetesis

      reutavidan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables scientific due diligence by grading claims against public literature, clinical trials, and filings, with explicit citations and optional attestation.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct task: quote checking, identifier mapping, log integrity, retraction status, literature search, citation listing, and support recording. Although retraction_status and check_quote both read PMC, their purposes (retraction notices vs. textual quote matching) are unambiguous from the descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (check_quote, resolve_identifier, verify_log, search_literature, record_support). Two deviate into noun phrases (retraction_status, citing_papers), which is a minor inconsistency but still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a literature-verification server, and each tool earns its place with a distinct role. No redundancy or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core verification lifecycle: quote checking, ID resolution, retraction checking, searching, citations, and support recording plus log auditing. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool to fetch full paper metadata or export/report the log), but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources