Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to litcheck-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to search scientific literature metadata across OpenAlex, Europe PMC, and Crossref, verify citations, retractions, source quotes, and claims, and build or export hash-chained evidence ledgers with explicit provenance and limitations.
      35
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables revision-bound source audits with exact article fingerprinting, claim-to-source mapping, quotation verification, and immutable JSON evidence reports for prepublication review.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to run PubMed searches in plain English, download full-text articles from PubMed Central, and map the similar, citing and cited evidence around key papers. It also builds an Obsidian knowledge graph of a study's literature, with retractions flagged and citations traceable to papers the assistant read.
      474 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create verifiable, replayable citations, search private knowledge bases, and publish Markdown with verified citation markers.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables researchers and AI assistants to verify bibliographic existence and metadata consistency, resolve DOI, PMID, PMCID, and arXiv identifiers, and perform explainable multi-source matching without destructive edits.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify manuscript references against public scholarly records, checking that cited works exist, match their citations, and have not been retracted or flagged. It also lets an agent gather the best source passages for each citing sentence and record its own claim-support verdicts back into the report.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct task: quote checking, identifier mapping, log integrity, retraction status, literature search, citation listing, and support recording. Although retraction_status and check_quote both read PMC, their purposes (retraction notices vs. textual quote matching) are unambiguous from the descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (check_quote, resolve_identifier, verify_log, search_literature, record_support). Two deviate into noun phrases (retraction_status, citing_papers), which is a minor inconsistency but still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a literature-verification server, and each tool earns its place with a distinct role. No redundancy or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core verification lifecycle: quote checking, ID resolution, retraction checking, searching, citations, and support recording plus log auditing. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool to fetch full paper metadata or export/report the log), but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues