Describir una funcion de ExcelSIIGO

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true, so the read-only nature is clear. The description adds context about the output content (parameters, order, defaults, example), which is useful given no output schema, but it does not disclose other behavioral details such as error handling or prerequisites.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a compact noun phrase that conveys the essential content without wasted words. It is appropriately sized, though it lacks a verb and could be slightly more explicit, so it does not earn a perfect 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter, read-only annotation, and no output schema, the description adequately explains what the tool returns. It is missing usage context, but the information provided is sufficient for a straightforward meta-function description tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema fully describes the single parameter 'funcion' with an example, so coverage is 100%. The tool description does not add any additional parameter-level meaning beyond that, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description lists what the tool provides (parameters, positional order, default values, and a manual example), making the purpose clear. The title 'Describir una funcion de ExcelSIIGO' adds the verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools that perform actual operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives like siigo_list_functions. The implication is that it is for looking up function details, but there is no direct statement of use cases or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.