Donetick MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Donetick MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA stdio MCP server that lets an AI assistant read and manage a self-hosted Donetick instance, including chores, recurrence, assignment, completions, activity history, circle members, and projects.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Donetick chores management. Provides 27 tools to control Donetick instance via Claude or other MCP clients.272MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that exposes a TODO list API to AI assistants, enabling natural language management of tasks with create, read, update, and delete operations.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for TickTick task management. Enables AI assistants to create, update, list, search, and complete tasks via natural language.53 npm29MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates with the Todoist REST API v2 to enable AI assistants to manage tasks, projects, sections, comments, and labels. It supports comprehensive operations including batch task creation, history tracking for completed tasks, and organized project management.33178 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that connects to a Laravel Tasks API, enabling AI assistants to perform CRUD operations on tasks.-
TDQS
Scored across 20 tools
Significant overlap exists: update_chore_assignee and update_chore_priority are redundant with the general update_chore tool, which can modify any property. Additionally, list_circle_users and get_circle_members have nearly identical purposes with only minor differences, causing ambiguity.
Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., create_chore, delete_label). The only minor inconsistency is mixing 'get' and 'list' prefixes for similar operations (get_circle_members vs list_circle_users), but overall the naming is predictable.
20 tools is well-scoped for a chore management system, covering all core operations without being excessive. Each tool serves a distinct function in the domain, and the count feels appropriate.
The tool set covers CRUD for chores and labels, completion tracking, history, and user management. Minor gaps include lack of a tool to update user profile settings or retrieve a single label by ID, but the core workflows are well-supported.