list_agents
List the 12 cs-* USAP orchestrator agents to identify available cybersecurity orchestration resources.
Instructions
List the 12 cs-* USAP orchestrator agents.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List the 12 cs-* USAP orchestrator agents to identify available cybersecurity orchestration resources.
List the 12 cs-* USAP orchestrator agents.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only mentions it lists agents. It fails to disclose critical behavioral aspects like authentication requirements, pagination, or output format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, efficient sentence that communicates the core action and its scope with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is too sparse. It does not specify what fields are returned (e.g., agent IDs, descriptions), leaving the agent with incomplete information.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With zero parameters and 100% schema coverage, the baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter information, but none is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb (list) and resource (the 12 cs-* USAP orchestrator agents), distinguishing it from siblings like get_agent and list_skills.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_agent for a single agent or list_skills for skills. The description lacks context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jaskaranhundal/usap-skills'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server