io.github.jarmstrong158/Conductor
Related Servers
Alternatives to io.github.jarmstrong158/Conductor
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceGive Claude direct access to your AWS account, SSH into your servers, run shell commands on your laptop, query your databases, and manage PM2 processes — all from a Claude chat. No Claude Code subscription needed. Your keys never leave your machine.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceGives Claude persistent, local context about how you work, your weekly agenda, and shipped work, with automatic work logging and git integration—all stored privately on your machine.12MIT
- FlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceBridges Claude Code to a Cloud Orchestrator API, providing access to multi-AI consensus, web search, code execution sandboxes, long-term memory, knowledge graphs, deployment management, and 20+ integrated AI and developer tools.28-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables building and running visual workflows conversationally inside Claude, orchestrating your existing connector tools step-by-step without storing credentials or owning integrations.4 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides unified control over personal automation ecosystem, enabling Claude to act as an operator orchestrating downloads, Notion sync, tax document OCR, financial data, and system health monitoring.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to hand off bulk, mechanical, read-heavy tasks to a local model, including agentic loops that can read, write, and run commands sandboxed at zero cloud token cost.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with worker, chain, group, and system operations cleanly separated. Parallel tools for workers vs chains are explicitly named (e.g., run_worker_now vs run_chain_now), preventing misselection.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, with verbs like list, create, delete, get, run. Minor deviations: 'delete_all_workers' actually deletes chains too (misleading name), and 'run_worker_now' includes a 'now' suffix not present in 'run_chain_now' (though that is also used). Overall predictable.
At 24 tools, this sits in the borderline range (16-25) and feels somewhat heavy. The domain is complex (workers, chains, groups, settings, admin), so each tool has a purpose, but the count could be streamlined by combining some operations (e.g., pause_all_workers and delete_all_workers).
Worker lifecycle is fully covered with list, create, update, delete, pause, run, history, and bulk operations. However, chains lack an update operation and an individual pause/resume toggle, which is a notable gap. Groups also lack update, but that is less critical. Agents can create and run chains but cannot modify them without deleting and recreating.