Skip to main content
Glama

dokploy_settings_updateTraefikConfig

dokploy_settings_updateTraefikConfig
Idempotent

Update Traefik reverse proxy configuration to manage routing rules, SSL certificates, and load balancing for applications deployed on Dokploy infrastructure.

Instructions

[settings] settings.updateTraefikConfig (POST)

Parameters:

  • traefikConfig (string, required)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
traefikConfigYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide readOnlyHint=false (indicating mutation), destructiveHint=false (non-destructive), idempotentHint=true (safe to retry), and openWorldHint=true (flexible input). The description adds no behavioral context beyond these annotations—it doesn't explain what 'update' entails (e.g., overwrites, merges), potential side effects, authentication needs, or rate limits. With annotations covering basic safety, the description adds minimal value, but doesn't contradict them, so a baseline 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and front-loaded with the tool signature, but it includes redundant information (e.g., '[settings]' prefix and '(POST)') that doesn't add value. The parameter listing is minimal but could be more integrated. While not verbose, it lacks efficiency in conveying essential information, making it adequate but with room for improvement in structure and clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given a mutation tool with annotations but no output schema and 0% schema description coverage, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain the purpose, usage, or parameter meaning sufficiently. The annotations help with behavioral hints, but the description fails to provide necessary context for safe and correct invocation, such as what the tool updates, expected input format, or implications of the update.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the schema provides no parameter descriptions. The description lists 'traefikConfig (string, required)' but doesn't explain what this parameter represents (e.g., YAML/JSON configuration content, file path, specific settings). It adds minimal semantics beyond the schema's type and requirement, failing to compensate for the lack of schema documentation, especially for a mutation tool with a single but likely complex parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states '[settings] settings.updateTraefikConfig (POST)' which is essentially a restatement of the tool name and title with the addition of 'POST'. It doesn't clearly articulate what the tool actually does (e.g., update Traefik configuration for what system/component, with what effect). While it mentions 'TraefikConfig', it lacks a specific verb-resource combination that distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'dokploy_settings_updateWebServerTraefikConfig' or 'dokploy_settings_updateMiddlewareTraefikConfig'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention any prerequisites, context, or exclusions. Given the presence of sibling tools like 'dokploy_settings_readTraefikConfig' and other update variants, there is no indication of when this specific update tool is appropriate, leading to potential confusion for an AI agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jarciahdz111/dokploy-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server