ha_stop_addon
Stop a running Home Assistant add-on by providing its slug. Halts the add-on process.
Instructions
Stop a running Home Assistant add-on
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | Add-on slug to stop |
Stop a running Home Assistant add-on by providing its slug. Halts the add-on process.
Stop a running Home Assistant add-on
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | Add-on slug to stop |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It states 'Stop a running Home Assistant add-on' but omits side effects (e.g., graceful shutdown, idempotency, permissions needed, or what happens if addon is already stopped). The description is too minimal for complete transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description lacks information about prerequisites (addon must be running) and error behavior. It is adequate but incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with the parameter 'slug' described as 'Add-on slug to stop'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema; it does not clarify what a slug is or how to obtain it. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Stop a running Home Assistant add-on' uses specific verb (stop) and resource (add-on), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like ha_start_addon and ha_restart_addon.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool (e.g., addon must be installed and running) or when not to use it. No alternatives or exclusions are mentioned, which is a gap given the presence of related tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jarahkon/hass-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server