ed-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ed-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for Ed Discussion that enables viewing profile, courses, lessons, threads, and submitting slide answers via natural language.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that allows AI assistants to access EdStem course discussion boards, including listing courses, fetching posts, searching, and retrieving thread details, with automated SSO login support for Georgia Tech.-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceExposes the full Ed Discussion API to MCP clients, enabling users to manage threads, comments, and course activity through natural language. It provides comprehensive tools for searching and posting content, featuring automatic conversion from markdown to Ed's internal XML format.243-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local MCP server that exposes Canvas LMS courses, assignments, grading, discussions, modules, pages, files, messaging, and peer reviews to an AI assistant through about 100 Markdown-returning tools, with preview-then-confirm behavior for any write operations.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Canvas LMS, providing 115+ tools to read courses, assignments, submissions, rubrics, quizzes; grade, comment, manage course content, and handle Canvas admin workflows from any AI agent.1631,451 npm7MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Canvas LMS that exposes courses, assignments, modules, pages, files, grades, and submissions as tools for AI agents.-
TDQS
Scored across 43 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (threads, comments, attendance, files, search). The three thread retrieval tools are differentiated by input type (global ID, UI number, URL), and the two search tools are explicitly distinguished as default vs fallback. Minor overlap exists between list_threads and search_index for browsing, but descriptions are clear.
The verb_noun pattern is consistent across most tools (create_thread, delete_comment, list_courses). Minor deviations like 'bulk_recategorise' and 'manual_check_in' slightly break the pattern, but the overall naming is predictable and readable.
43 tools is far beyond the typical well-scoped range. While the platform (Ed Discussion) has many features, this many tools creates a heavy surface for agents to navigate and increases selection risk.
The toolset provides comprehensive CRUD and lifecycle coverage for threads, comments, attendance sessions, and check-ins, plus search, files, and user/course info. No major dead ends; some minor gaps like category creation/editing exist but don't hamper core workflows.