Skip to main content
Glama
jansc4

rag-pipeline

by jansc4
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to rag-pipeline

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Hybrid RAG Project MCP Server

      gwyer
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to perform hybrid search across local documents by combining semantic vector retrieval and BM25 keyword matching for optimal context recovery. It supports multiple file formats including PDF, CSV, and Markdown, leveraging local Ollama models for private and efficient document querying.
      4
      MIT

    • Personal Research Assistant

      chakri01
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search and conversational querying across a personal research library of PDFs, DOCX, and other documents using a vector database. It provides tools for document summarization, finding related papers, and high-accuracy retrieval for AI clients like Claude Desktop.
      -

    • Metis

      SVerITG
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A second brain for researchers — gives Claude persistent memory of your papers, field, and working history, with answers cited from your own indexed library
      100
      3
      AGPL 3.0

    • XLMCP

      xLydianSoftware
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to interact with Jupyter notebooks, perform semantic search over knowledge files, and manage research projects.
      33
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct roles: one adds documents to the index, the other queries it. There is no overlap or ambiguity between ingestion and search.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools follow a verb_noun pattern and are recognizable at a glance. The only minor inconsistency is that one uses the plural 'papers' while the other uses singular 'paper'.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is a thin surface, falling below the typical 3-15 well-scoped range. Each tool is essential for the core RAG workflow, but the set still feels minimal for anything beyond basic ingest-and-query usage.

    Completeness3/5

    The core ingest and search operations are present, giving agents the main RAG loop. However, there is no way to list, delete, or update ingested papers, which leaves obvious workflow gaps around managing the collection.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources