Stop Timer
stop_timerStop the currently running timer to record its end time and calculate the duration.
Instructions
Stop the currently running timer
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
stop_timerStop the currently running timer to record its end time and calculate the duration.
Stop the currently running timer
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The annotations already declare destructiveHint: false, and the description adds nothing beyond stating the action. Since the tool has no parameters or complex behavior, the description suffices but does not enhance transparency beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no filler, front-loaded with the verb and resource. Every word contributes to meaning.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description fully captures its purpose. Sibling tools provide context, making the definition complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, and schema coverage is 100% trivially. The description does not need to add parameter information, so a baseline score of 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Stop the currently running timer' clearly identifies the verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like start_timer or get_active_timer. It is specific and not a tautology.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies the tool is for stopping an active timer, but lacks explicit guidance on when not to use it or mention of alternatives. For a zero-parameter tool, this is adequate but not exemplary.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/janfincke/early-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server