Arc token launch record

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, openWorldHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds meaningful behavioral context by disclosing the returned data shape and explicitly noting what is not included: price, liquidity, and holder data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence that identifies the resource first, then lists the record contents, and closes with exclusions. Every clause earns its place by clarifying what the returned launch record contains or omits.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description carries most of the burden for explaining return contents, and it does so thoroughly for a read-only lookup. It omits minor details such as response structure or error behavior, but an agent has enough information to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is one required parameter and schema description coverage is 100%, with the schema already documenting the token address format. The description does not add parameter-specific meaning beyond implying the tool operates on one Arc token, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states this is a launch record for one Arc token and enumerates the record's contents, including launchpad, deployer, first pool, transfers, recipients, and same-symbol attributed tokens. It distinguishes the tool from price/liquidity/holder-oriented tools, though it does not explicitly name sibling alternatives like robinx_token.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives implicit usage guidance by framing the tool as a launch-record lookup and explicitly excluding price, liquidity, and holder data. However, it does not state when to choose this over robinx_token, robinx_arc_deployer, or other siblings, leaving alternative selection to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.