Skip to main content
Glama
jamesrosing

tebra-mcp-server

by jamesrosing

Related Servers

Alternatives to tebra-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects AI assistants to OpenEMR instances to manage patient records, clinical trends, and medication safety. It provides 17 tools for tasks such as patient search, drug interaction checks, and generating comprehensive health trajectories and visit preparations.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs and MCP clients to interact with patient records, encounters, and practice information through tools for clinical, scheduling, messaging, and administrative workflows.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Clinical decision-support MCP server that lets AI agents reason over live FHIR patient data for medication review, appointment scheduling, and care gap identification.
      10,440 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Centralized MCP server that provides a unified tool surface for accessing AdvancedMD data, managing credentials, sessions, and rate limits for multiple backend workflows and AI agents via HTTP or MCP.
      Academic Free v1.1
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Semble practice-management API, enabling AI agents to search for patients, contacts, and users, as well as retrieve patient relationships via read-only tools.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 34 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct Tebra resource and action, and descriptions clearly separate similar entities like appointments vs. appointment details and patients vs. patient searches. A few adjacent pairs such as get_charges/get_payments/get_transactions or check_insurance_eligibility/get_patient_authorizations could be confused, but the descriptions draw reasonable boundaries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows the tebra_ prefix with a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern, such as get_patient, create_appointment, update_encounter_status, and delete_document. There are no mixed conventions, vague verbs, or unpredictable naming styles.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 34 tools, the server is well beyond the typical well-scoped range and adds significant selection overhead for an agent. While most tools serve distinct purposes, the overall surface feels heavy for a single MCP server.

    Completeness3/5

    Core patient, appointment, encounter, and payment workflows are substantially covered, including create/read/update/status operations. However, there are notable gaps such as no encounter detail editing, no document retrieval/listing, and no creation or update of authorizations or patient cases.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow