Skip to main content
Glama
jamesjohnsdev

Better Auth MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Better Auth MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enterprise-grade authentication solution that provides secure credential management with encryption, multi-protocol authentication (OAuth2, SAML, LDAP), and real-time threat detection for applications.
      8
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Centralized credential management for servers, websites, and APIs with HashiCorp Vault integration. Provides authentication, authorization, and audit logging for secure access to secrets.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables teams to securely store and retrieve credentials, view decrypted secrets or live OAuth tokens, and connect to third-party MCP servers through a unified MCP endpoint.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely manage local credentials, obtain short-lived tokens for authenticated API access, and audit every use by purpose.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides an enterprise-grade Model Context Protocol implementation with advanced security features including multi-factor authentication, encryption, and RBAC. Enables secure tool management and context handling for production deployments with comprehensive monitoring and high availability.
      2 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Centralized authentication, authorization, and audit for MCP tools. One server governs every downstream MCP your organization uses.
      3
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between analyze_current_auth, analyze_project, and analyze_logs, which all involve analysis and could potentially be confused for similar tasks. However, their descriptions clarify specific focuses (existing implementation, project structure, logs), reducing ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case, such as analyze_current_auth, setup_better_auth, and test_auth_flows. This predictability makes it easy for agents to understand and select tools based on their naming conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of migrating to and managing Better-Auth. Each tool serves a clear role in the migration and monitoring process, from analysis and setup to testing and monitoring, without being overly sparse or bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers key aspects of migration (analysis, setup, testing, monitoring) but lacks explicit tools for updating or deleting configurations, which might be needed for ongoing maintenance. However, core workflows are well-covered, allowing agents to handle most migration tasks effectively.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues