Skip to main content
Glama
jameshgrn

firepass-mcp

by jameshgrn
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to firepass-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • kimi-api-mcp

      bene-bosco
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides file operations and Moonshot API-powered tools (reasoning, code review, testing, research, web search, agent) for Kimi K2.5, requiring only a Moonshot API key.
      930 npm
      1
      MIT

    • nanocode-mcp

      hamishfromatech
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server for file manipulation, code searching, and shell command execution, with optional semantic search using local embeddings.
      1
      MIT

    • THU Agent by CyberCraze

      cybercrazetech
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An interactive coding agent and MCP server that provides access to various AI models via the Tsinghua University lab proxy API. It enables users to inspect files and execute shell commands within their local directory using models like DeepSeek, GLM, and Qwen.
      10
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct agent role: researcher is read-only analysis, reviewer is read-only code review with structured output, worker can write files and run commands, and trio orchestrates the full pipeline. The descriptions make the boundaries clear despite researcher and reviewer sharing a read-only tool loop.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the same firepass_<role> naming convention with single-word role identifiers. The pattern is immediately predictable and there are no mixed styles or vague generic verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for this server: it exposes exactly the three FirePass agent modes plus the combined trio workflow. Each tool earns its place and the count feels neither thin nor bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full intended workflow: research, implementation, review, and an orchestrated research→implement→review→fix loop. There are no obvious dead ends or missing core operations for the stated domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources