okf_registry_remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry the full burden of disclosing behavior. It clearly indicates removal, but does not state whether the deletion is permanent, reversible, idempotent, or what happens if the slug does not exist. This is a notable gap for a mutating registry tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence communicates the core action with no wasted words. For a one-parameter tool, this is appropriately concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is too sparse for a destructive operation with no annotations and no output schema. It does not explain the return value, error cases, or downstream effects of removing the slug, leaving an agent without enough context to handle unexpected outcomes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description could have compensated, but it only echoes the parameter name 'slug' without explaining its format, origin, or constraints. It minimally links the slug to the registry context, but adds little meaning beyond the schema's property name and type.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Remove') and a specific resource ('a slug from the registry'), making the operation immediately clear. It also distinguishes itself from sibling tools like okf_registry_add, okf_registry_list, and okf_registry_resolve by naming the removal action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as okf_registry_add or okf_registry_resolve. The description does not mention prerequisites, exclusions, or conditions under which removal should be preferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.