mcp-deadmansnitch
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-deadmansnitch
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI agents manage cron jobs through natural language — adding, listing, pausing, removing, running, and viewing logs of scheduled jobs with plain-English schedule parsing, automatic log capture, missed-run detection, and failure alerts.MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Loggy that enables AI coding assistants to manage heartbeats, status pages, uptime monitors, feature flags, and logs via natural language.15-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn open-source MCP server enabling AI assistants to interact with the Motion API for intelligent task and project management.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for CronAlert uptime monitoring — manage monitors, check results, and incidents from any MCP-compatible AI client.962 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server that allows AI coding assistants to schedule deferred tasks such as reminders, shell commands, and AI prompts, executing them as an OS daemon.2 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Exit1 uptime monitoring. Enables AI assistants to create and manage uptime checks, configure alerts, and query status via natural language.32 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusing separate tools. The actions within the tool (list, get, create, etc.) are distinct and clearly named, eliminating any ambiguity.
The single tool name 'snitch' is a noun representing the resource, and all actions follow a consistent verb style (list, get, create, update, delete, pause, unpause). The naming pattern is uniform and predictable, making it easy to understand the available operations.
While the tool count is only 1, it effectively acts as a subcommand interface covering all core operations. This is slightly unusual but remains well-scoped given the narrow domain of Dead Man's Snitch monitoring, so the count is reasonable.
The actions provide full CRUD coverage plus monitoring-specific operations (pause, unpause, check_in) and tag management. No obvious gaps exist for the stated purpose, and the optional parameters cover additional needs like alert types and notes.