Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to nohumans-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and verify machine-payable HTTP 402/x402 APIs using live probe data, providing ranked results by liveness, uptime, price, and trustworthiness.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify that an x402 API is live, real, and fairly priced before authorizing a payment, and to query live market data on agent commerce across Base and Solana. Exposes twelve tools covering pre-payment checks, provider ranking, liveness lookups, market snapshots and diffs, circular-settlement and whale signals, token metrics, provider revenue, and monthly report data, with free, free-key, and paid x402 tiers.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to discover and call x402 paid services from a directory of over 2,000 APIs.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Discovers and routes across 251+ x402-enabled payment services with smart routing strategies (cheapest, fastest, most trusted) and signed attestations. Provides real-time health monitoring, facilitator compatibility checks, and service quality scoring for the x402 agent payment ecosystem.
      5
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Discovers and queries x402-payable APIs at runtime — enables autonomous agents to find, evaluate, and pay for services via USDC micropayments on Base without API keys or subscriptions.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a clear primary axis: search by need, fetch by id, resolve by URL, and read aggregate demand terms. The only friction is between get_service_details and resolve_endpoint, since resolve_endpoint also returns 'the listing's full record' for a known URL, so an agent holding both an id and a URL could hesitate between them. Descriptions do enough to resolve this in practice.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (find_paid_service, get_service_details, resolve_endpoint). The fourth, what_agents_are_asking_for, breaks the pattern with a full question-phrase name, which is memorable and readable but inconsistent with the rest of the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four read-only tools for a directory search/vetting server is tight and well-scoped, with no filler tools. It sits near the thin end of the range, and a couple of capabilities (e.g. listing/comparing) are absent rather than extra.

    Completeness4/5

    The discover → inspect → verify lifecycle is covered: search, detail by id, resolve an externally held URL, plus a seller-side demand signal. The obvious gap is that the surface is purely read-only — there is no tool to submit/register a listing or to actually probe/sample a paid endpoint, which the descriptions repeatedly gesture at ('has_sample', 'a cheap preview exists') without exposing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data