get_alerts

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states the tool returns 'Formatted alerts or error message' but does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, rate limits, authentication needs, or error conditions. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a clear structure: purpose line, args section, returns section. It is front-loaded and each sentence serves a purpose, though it omits some useful context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool with no output schema or annotations, the description is adequate. It explains the input format and basic return, but lacks details on what 'active' means, possible multiple alerts, formatting specifics, and error scenarios.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only defines 'state' as a string with a title. The description adds crucial detail: 'Two-letter state code (e.g., 'CA', 'NY')', clarifying format and providing examples. Since schema description coverage is 0%, the description compensates effectively.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'active weather alerts', and the scope 'for a state'. It effectively distinguishes from siblings: 'get_forecast' is for forecasts, 'run_shell_command' is unrelated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving weather alerts by state but does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives or provide exclusion criteria. No when-not or prerequisite information is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.