Skip to main content
Glama
uol-mcp

uol-mcp

by jakubbegera

Related Servers

Alternatives to uol-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable clients to read and write directly in epago accounting, including chart of accounts, transactions, invoices, payments, receipts, and tax reports.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to read invoices, supplier invoices, vouchers, financial reports, and AR/AP ageing from a Swedish accounting system, with optional draft-only write tools for customers, offers, orders, and unsent invoice drafts after confirmation. It also exposes many other read endpoints through a safety allowlist.
      26
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to read and write Bokio accounting data for one company through 85 tools covering invoices, customers, suppliers, journal entries, chart of accounts, fiscal years, items, tags, uploads, SIE export, and bank payments.
      40
      96 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to query and register invoices, suppliers, and payments through the Contasimple API v2, including optional write access for creating records, attaching files, and managing payments.
      16
      834 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying and managing a live accounting ledger, including transactions, balances, VAT summaries, deadlines, and documents, from any MCP client.
      86
      107 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with the QuickBooks Online Accounting API to manage customers, invoices, expenses, and payments through MCP-compatible clients. It supports comprehensive financial workflows and the generation of reports like Profit and Loss or Balance Sheets.
      138
      2
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools target clearly distinct resources and actions (sales vs purchase invoices, contacts, documents, receivables, VAT, bank, financials), and descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other to steer selection (e.g. prefer list_receivables over search_sales_invoices for 'who owes me money'). Minor overlap remains between get_business_snapshot and the dedicated overview tools, and api_get acts as a catch-all that could tempt misselection, but the guidance to prefer dedicated tools mitigates this.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: get_, search_, list_, export_, download_ (get_sales_invoice, search_contacts, list_receivables, etc.). The only deviation is api_get (noun_verb), which is a reasonable special-case escape hatch but breaks the otherwise uniform convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 18 tools it sits in the heavier band, but for a full accounting domain (invoices, contacts, documents, VAT, bank, ledger, codebooks) each tool maps to a distinct need. The set is slightly large but no tool feels redundant; a couple of the overview tools could arguably be folded together.

    Completeness4/5

    The read surface is comprehensive: invoices, contacts, uploaded documents, receivables, VAT, bank balances, financial overview, snapshot and codebooks, with api_get as a fallback for uncovered endpoints. Gaps are mostly API-imposed (no purchase-invoice export, no purchase payment status) plus the entire absence of write operations, which limits it to a read-only reporting server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues