No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 5 tools
list_objects (enumerate) and outline_object (describe one object) are clearly distinct, and run_tests is unambiguous. The only real overlap is check_conventions vs lint, both static-quality checks, though the descriptions differentiate them (Clean ABAP style-guide findings vs abaplint syntax/type/naming analysis).
Four of five tools follow a predictable verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_objects, outline_object, check_conventions, run_tests). 'lint' is a bare verb that breaks the pattern slightly but is still conventional and readable.
Five tools is a lean but reasonable surface for a read-only ABAP analysis server, and each tool has a distinct role. It sits slightly on the thin side, but nothing feels redundant or missing at the count level.
The analysis workflow (discover, outline, style-check, lint, test) is well covered for a read-only server. Minor gaps remain: no way to fetch an object's raw source and no object/code search, which agents can partially work around via outline_object and lint's source argument.