rails-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to rails-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnforces fine-grained, context-aware access control on MCP tool calls, with a tamper-evident, replayable audit log that records denials and verifies every decision.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceRetired snapshot of the former 15-tool Apache-2.0 beta. Use Living Stack Community for the free seven-tool proof edition; Complete Local is the paid runtime with memory, recovery, signed traces, release verification, and multi-agent workflows.14Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that gates agent tool calls by normalizing intent, denying unknown/unattended destructive actions, and requiring HITL prove approval for high-risk operations. It maintains an append-only hash-chained Action Ledger and exposes gate_check and ledger_verify tools without ever executing tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnforces deterministic security policies as an inline firewall for MCP server tool calls, with AST-based validation, cryptographic audit logging, and CLI-based evaluation and verification.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides policy-driven runtime authorization and security evaluation for MCP-based agents, including MCP streaming HTTP gateway, mock MCP servers, deterministic agent demos, and audited tool invocation with redacted PostgreSQL audit chains.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a governed execution boundary for AI agents, enforcing deterministic policy, one-shot human approvals, and signed receipts for MCP tool effects.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: classification, registry lookup, hash digest, sign-off state, spend recording, and budget evaluation. Even the two action-related tools are explicitly differentiated: one always returns a fixed verdict, the other is purely informational.
All tool names follow a clear verb_noun pattern (classify_, is_, get_, record_, evaluate_). The 'is_' prefix for a boolean check is consistent with common naming conventions, and there is no mixing of styles.
Six tools is well within the ideal range for a focused governance/guardrail server. Each tool has a clear responsibility, and the set feels neither sparse nor bloated.
The surface covers the core lifecycle: classification, registry status, hash verification, sign-off state, spend intent recording, and budget evaluation. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool to inspect individual ledger entries or revoke sign-off), but these are intentionally delegated to CLI or aggregate operations, so the coverage is reasonable.