Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to rails-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enforces fine-grained, context-aware access control on MCP tool calls, with a tamper-evident, replayable audit log that records denials and verifies every decision.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Retired snapshot of the former 15-tool Apache-2.0 beta. Use Living Stack Community for the free seven-tool proof edition; Complete Local is the paid runtime with memory, recovery, signed traces, release verification, and multi-agent workflows.
      14
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gates agent tool calls by normalizing intent, denying unknown/unattended destructive actions, and requiring HITL prove approval for high-risk operations. It maintains an append-only hash-chained Action Ledger and exposes gate_check and ledger_verify tools without ever executing tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enforces deterministic security policies as an inline firewall for MCP server tool calls, with AST-based validation, cryptographic audit logging, and CLI-based evaluation and verification.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides policy-driven runtime authorization and security evaluation for MCP-based agents, including MCP streaming HTTP gateway, mock MCP servers, deterministic agent demos, and audited tool invocation with redacted PostgreSQL audit chains.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a governed execution boundary for AI agents, enforcing deterministic policy, one-shot human approvals, and signed receipts for MCP tool effects.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: classification, registry lookup, hash digest, sign-off state, spend recording, and budget evaluation. Even the two action-related tools are explicitly differentiated: one always returns a fixed verdict, the other is purely informational.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a clear verb_noun pattern (classify_, is_, get_, record_, evaluate_). The 'is_' prefix for a boolean check is consistent with common naming conventions, and there is no mixing of styles.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well within the ideal range for a focused governance/guardrail server. Each tool has a clear responsibility, and the set feels neither sparse nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: classification, registry status, hash verification, sign-off state, spend intent recording, and budget evaluation. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool to inspect individual ledger entries or revoke sign-off), but these are intentionally delegated to CLI or aggregate operations, so the coverage is reasonable.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues