TypeScript LSP MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to TypeScript LSP MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to interact with TypeScript projects through compiler-level code intelligence, providing tools for navigation, type information, diagnostics, refactoring, and semantic search.29202 npm3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables coding agents to navigate TypeScript, Markdown, and JSON with editor-grade features such as definitions, references, diagnostics, and code actions via the Model Context Protocol, using the local TypeScript project for each file.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes type-aware code navigation and fast file search to AI agents via language servers, enabling definitions, references, symbols, and file lookup without reading entire codebases.829 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time TypeScript diagnostics with intelligent caching for AI agents, enabling instant queries instead of running tsc repeatedly.925 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI agents with language-aware code analysis through the Language Server Protocol, enabling tasks like getting code insights and diagnostics.4 npm191MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to navigate and edit TypeScript/JavaScript source by named declarations, reading symbols, imports, diagnostics, and replacing code via the TypeScript AST.-
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool targets a distinct LSP feature (type-checking, completions, definitions, diagnostics, hover, references, type queries, type tests, type tracing). There is no overlap or ambiguity between tools.
Most tools follow a 'get' + noun pattern (getCompletions, getDefinition, etc.), with two exceptions: 'checkInlineCode' uses 'check' and 'runTypeTests' uses 'run'. This minor inconsistency prevents a perfect score.
9 tools is an appropriate size for a TypeScript LSP server. It covers essential features without being bloated or too sparse.
The tools cover core LSP operations (diagnostics, hover, definition, references, completions, type queries) and even include niche features (type tracing, type tests). Missing common operations like code actions, rename, or formatting, but the set is largely complete for its apparent purpose.