Skip to main content
Glama
jaeko44

MYOB Codex MCP

by jaeko44

Related Servers

Alternatives to MYOB Codex MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This read-only MCP Server allows you to connect to MYOB AccountRight data from Claude Desktop through CData JDBC Drivers. Free (beta) read/write servers available at https://www.cdata.com/solutions/mcp
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for self-hosted Manager.io bookkeeping, providing curated GET tools to access accounting data like invoices, balances, and reports.
      10
      59 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables an MCP client such as Claude Code to run financial reports, query records, and create, update, void, delete, deactivate, email, or attach records in a company's QuickBooks Online books through the Accounting API. It runs locally over stdio with read and write tools separated, dry-run previews, an optional read-only mode, and a local audit log so the owner stays in control of every change.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Safe-write Shopify operations MCP server with plan-before-execute writes, out-of-band approval, and tamper-evident audit trail.
      44 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Hosted MCP server for Exact Online. Ask questions, pull reports, and prepare bookings you approve first.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 63 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are clearly separated by entity (invoice, bill, customer), but there is overlap between generic raw/entity tools and entity-specific tools (e.g., myob_entity_list vs myob_invoice_list). The alias myob_oauth_authorize duplicates myob_oauth_authorize_business, and myob_raw_commit_mutation vs myob_commit_operation vs myob_approval_approve creates boundary confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The overwhelming pattern is myob_<resource>_<action> (e.g., account_list, invoice_get), with only a few deviations like myob_commit_operation (missing resource prefix) and myob_oauth_authorize_business (compound action). Overall, the naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 63 tools, this is far above the typical 3-15 well-scoped range. While the MYOB domain is broad, the number of tools creates a heavy decision surface for agents, and many are list-only variants that could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers a wide range of MYOB entities (accounts, customers, suppliers, invoices, bills, payments, inventory, jobs, etc.) with list/get operations, and prepare/commit flows for core mutations. The generic raw endpoint tools and metadata tools fill most gaps, though some mutations (e.g., employee, job) are only possible via the raw layer.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues