Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to CascadeGateway

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Unified MCP server for managing local model runtimes (Ollama, LM Studio, etc.), enabling provider-agnostic discovery, lifecycle management, hardware-fit checks, and delegated inference.
      16
      18 npm
      Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that delegates mechanical tasks like summarization, classification, extraction, and drafting to a local Llama.cpp LLM, serving as a cost-optimization layer while Claude handles reasoning and quality control.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Unified MCP server for querying multiple LLM providers (Gemini, OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) with advanced routing, cost optimization, and fallback resilience.
      2
      15 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first LLM routing MCP server that keeps sensitive data on your own models, with fail-closed privacy and manager-worker delegation, exposing route and complete tools to any MCP client.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    query_local_5090 and cascade_llm both execute queries, but the descriptions clearly distinguish local-only vs cascading backends. get_cascade_metrics is clearly a metrics tool. Minor overlap remains in the query execution purpose, but an agent can tell them apart.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are snake_case, but the patterns are mixed: query_local_5090 starts with a verb, cascade_llm is a noun phrase, and get_cascade_metrics is verb_noun. Readable but not a predictable convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools are well-scoped for a cascading LLM gateway: local query, cascaded query, and metrics. Each tool has a clear role and the count avoids redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The core operations—run a local query, run a cascaded query, and monitor metrics—are covered. However, there is no tool to configure or set dynamic biasing, which is a minor gap for controlling gateway behavior.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues