GeoTrek MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to GeoTrek MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for planning routes (hiking, biking, driving, etc.) using the OpenRouteService API. Provides tools to find coordinates, create routes with GPX/PNG/HTML output, search POIs, and compute reachable areas.637 PyPI2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for geocoding French addresses, POIs, and cadastral parcels using the Géoplateforme API. Supports direct geocoding, reverse geocoding, and capability queries.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for geocoding, reverse geocoding, place/POI search, and distance calculation using OpenStreetMap Nominatim, with no API key required.47 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server providing geocoding and place discovery services via Nominatim and OpenStreetMap. It enables users to perform forward and reverse geocoding, extract bounding boxes, and find nearby places or administrative hierarchies.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn experimental MCP server providing spatial context for LLMs by interfacing with French Geoplateforme services. It enables tasks such as geocoding, altitude lookups, and querying administrative, cadastral, or urban planning data.7 npm4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for querying French railway services (SNCF) via the Navitia API, enabling station search, journey planning, and departure board retrieval.-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a distinctly different purpose: listing activities, listing labels, and searching treks. There is no overlap or potential for misselection.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (list_activities, list_labels, search_treks), making the API predictable.
Three tools is a minimal but appropriate set for a search-focused server. Each tool is needed to support the core search workflow, though the count is at the lower boundary of the typical range.
The core workflow of listing valid filter values and searching treks is fully covered. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of a dedicated get-trek-by-id tool, but search likely returns full trek details, so agents can work around this.