Module Craft
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| plan_moduleA | Takes a high-level module description and generates a detailed development plan in Markdown format |
| analyze_code_qualityC | Analyzes module code to ensure it adheres to best practices |
| check_security_vulnerabilitiesB | Scans code for security vulnerabilities and dependency issues |
| evaluate_performanceB | Analyzes code performance and identifies bottlenecks |
| generate_documentationC | Automatically generates and maintains code documentation |
| check_accessibilityC | Ensures UI-related modules are accessible according to WCAG standards |
| validate_requirementsB | Compares implemented module against initial requirements |
| track_progressC | Provides an overview of module development status |
| define_module_requirementsB | Generates comprehensive requirements documentation for a new module based on business context and objectives |
| evaluate_module_progressB | Evaluates the development progress of a specific module by analyzing its source code against main objectives |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but track_progress and evaluate_module_progress overlap significantly in tracking module status, and plan_module vs define_module_requirements could be confused for similar planning activities. Overall, descriptions reduce most ambiguity, but these pairs create potential misselection.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern, such as plan_module, analyze_code_quality, and generate_documentation. The naming convention is uniform and predictable across the entire set.
The server has 10 tools, which is well-scoped for a module development workflow covering planning, requirements, analysis, documentation, validation, and progress tracking. Each tool contributes a distinct phase of the lifecycle without unnecessary bloat.
The toolset covers major module development phases well, from requirements and planning through quality, security, performance, accessibility, documentation, and progress validation. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit tool for listing or selecting modules, and the overlap between progress-related tools leaves some lifecycle aspects somewhat redundant.