megalaunch_list_orders

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions listing orders with filtering but fails to disclose critical traits like whether this is a read-only operation, if it requires authentication, rate limits, pagination behavior beyond the schema, or what the output format looks like. This is inadequate for a tool with no annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the core purpose ('List your token launch orders') and adds a key feature ('with optional status filter'). There is no wasted text, making it appropriately sized and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a listing tool with 3 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain the return values, error conditions, or behavioral aspects like pagination handling, leaving significant gaps for an AI agent to understand how to use it effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters (status, limit, offset) with descriptions and constraints. The description adds minimal value by hinting at the 'status' filter but doesn't provide additional semantics beyond what the schema offers, such as example status values or usage tips.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('List') and resource ('your token launch orders'), making the purpose specific and understandable. It distinguishes itself from siblings like 'megalaunch_get_order' (singular) and 'megalaunch_create_order' (creation), but doesn't explicitly mention how it differs from 'megalaunch_status' or 'megalaunch_pricing'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context by mentioning 'optional status filter', suggesting it's for retrieving orders with possible filtering. However, it doesn't provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'megalaunch_get_order' for single orders or 'megalaunch_status' for status checks, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.