Skip to main content
Glama
jacksonnnzzz

leam-opt-mcp

by jacksonnnzzz
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to leam-opt-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-openems

      RFingAdam
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI-assisted design of antennas and electromagnetic structures using openEMS FDTD simulation, with analytical dimension calculators and full-wave script generation.
      16
      1
      AGPL 3.0

    • hfss-agent-native

      K-13ROBOT
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural language control of HFSS (v2019-2025) for antenna modeling, simulation, and result extraction via win32com without PyAEDT.
      5
      MIT

    • rf-agent

      tisn1678065900-dot
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables closed-loop RF passive design from natural-language requirements to EM-verified Altium boards, automating parametric layout, HFSS simulation, and Optuna optimization via MCP tools.
      12
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • cst-sim

      valenZW
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language control of CST Studio Suite for electromagnetic simulation, covering modeling, materials, ports, solvers, result reading, and VBA scripting, with an embedded knowledge base and constraint hooks that self-evolve through use.
      6
      Apache 2.0

    • cst-mcp

      AndersOnLin4
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Turns CST Studio Suite into an AI-controllable electromagnetic design lab, enabling conversational THz metamaterial absorber design, unit-cell automation, Floquet port control, batch solve with checkpoint-resume, and surrogate-model predictions.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools involve approval hashes and source refinement, making boundaries unclear (e.g., approve_antenna_source vs approve_antenna_engineering_assumption vs prepare_antenna_artifact_review). Pairs like refine_antenna_source and recheck_antenna_source appear to do nearly the same thing, causing likely misselection.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming mixes antenna and hfss prefixes (create_antenna_modeling_job vs build_hfss_project) and includes a noun-phrase tool (antenna_server_health). Verb forms vary (create, generate, build, compile) and long names like regenerate_antenna_python_from_feedback break any clean pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 22 tools, the server is on the heavy side, though the complexity of the domain (source analysis, modeling, simulation, optimization) justifies many steps. However, the number feels bloated due to overlapping tools that could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers a full pipeline from source analysis through approval, Python generation, feedback, and HFSS optimization. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no job listing/cancellation, no pipeline status), but the core workflow is thoroughly covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources