Skip to main content
Glama
jacksonnnzzz

leam-opt-mcp

by jacksonnnzzz

Related Servers

Alternatives to leam-opt-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI-assisted design of antennas and electromagnetic structures using openEMS FDTD simulation, with analytical dimension calculators and full-wave script generation.
      16
      2
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to drive RF/microwave design and simulation workflows, including geometry synthesis, multi-solver execution, quality checks, and optimization, with sandboxed draft-and-validate edits.
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural language control of HFSS (v2019-2025) for antenna modeling, simulation, and result extraction via win32com without PyAEDT.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables closed-loop RF passive design from natural-language requirements to EM-verified Altium boards, automating parametric layout, HFSS simulation, and Optuna optimization via MCP tools.
      12
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language-driven modeling, simulation, and optimization of antennas in CST Studio Suite, covering geometry, materials, ports, solvers, S-parameters, far-field analysis, parameter sweeps, and optimization via 73 MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language control of CST Studio Suite for electromagnetic simulation, covering modeling, materials, ports, solvers, result reading, and VBA scripting, with an embedded knowledge base and constraint hooks that self-evolve through use.
      8
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools involve approval hashes and source refinement, making boundaries unclear (e.g., approve_antenna_source vs approve_antenna_engineering_assumption vs prepare_antenna_artifact_review). Pairs like refine_antenna_source and recheck_antenna_source appear to do nearly the same thing, causing likely misselection.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming mixes antenna and hfss prefixes (create_antenna_modeling_job vs build_hfss_project) and includes a noun-phrase tool (antenna_server_health). Verb forms vary (create, generate, build, compile) and long names like regenerate_antenna_python_from_feedback break any clean pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 22 tools, the server is on the heavy side, though the complexity of the domain (source analysis, modeling, simulation, optimization) justifies many steps. However, the number feels bloated due to overlapping tools that could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers a full pipeline from source analysis through approval, Python generation, feedback, and HFSS optimization. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no job listing/cancellation, no pipeline status), but the core workflow is thoroughly covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues