search_book
Find books on Douban by entering a keyword. Specify the number of results (up to 20) to get relevant book details.
Instructions
按关键词搜索豆瓣图书。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| q | Yes | ||
| count | No |
Find books on Douban by entering a keyword. Specify the number of results (up to 20) to get relevant book details.
按关键词搜索豆瓣图书。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| q | Yes | ||
| count | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already mark readOnlyHint=true. The description adds no behavioral context beyond the search action, such as pagination, rate limits, or result format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence. It could be more structured (e.g., front-loading key info), but it effectively communicates the core purpose without waste.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple search tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks specifics on result handling or search scope.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description does not explain the parameters (e.g., what 'q' accepts, how 'count' affects results) beyond the schema constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool searches Douban books by keyword. It distinguishes from siblings like get_book (single book) and search_movie (movies).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like get_book for details. The description only states what it does, not when it's appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jackjin1997/douban-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server