MCP Aruba Email & Calendar Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Aruba Email & Calendar Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to connect to any email provider via IMAP/SMTP, supporting account management and email operations like listing, sending, and marking emails.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to email accounts via IMAP/SMTP, enabling reading, searching, sending, and organizing emails with features like smart drafts, scheduling, and attachment handling.82 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with email accounts via IMAP and SMTP, supporting mailbox listing, email search, retrieval, sending, and management.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, send, organize, and search emails across multiple IMAP/SMTP mailboxes.1,026 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to send, read, and manage emails via SMTP and IMAP, with support for attachments, threads, and mailbox organization.166 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, search, compose, and send emails by connecting to any IMAP/SMTP provider. It supports comprehensive mailbox management, including draft handling and message deletion, directly through natural language.10209 npm10MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no significant overlap. Calendar tools handle specific actions (accept, decline, tentative, create, delete, list), email tools cover distinct operations (list, read, search, send, check bounces, manage signatures), and the separation between email and calendar domains is clear. An agent can easily differentiate between tools like list_emails and search_emails or accept_calendar_event and decline_calendar_event.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case throughout. Calendar tools use verbs like accept, decline, create, delete, list, tentative paired with 'calendar_event', while email tools use verbs like list, read, search, send, check, get, set paired with 'email' or related nouns (e.g., 'email_signature', 'bounced_emails'). This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy to navigate.
With 14 tools, the count is well-suited for the server's dual-domain purpose of email and calendar management. It provides comprehensive coverage without being overwhelming, balancing core operations (e.g., CRUD for events, email listing/sending) with specialized utilities (e.g., signature management, bounce checking). This scope aligns with typical productivity server expectations.
The tool set offers strong coverage for both email and calendar domains, including full lifecycle management for calendar events (create, list, accept/decline/tentative, delete) and essential email operations (send, list, read, search, bounce checking, signature management). Minor gaps exist, such as no tools for updating calendar events or managing email folders, but agents can work around these with the provided tools without significant hindrance.