Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
文书查 / SinoVerdict MCP — Legacy Client

文书查 / SinoVerdict MCP — Legacy Client

by jack0752168
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote
This server has been deprecated

This listing describes the historical local Beta client, not the current production service. Use Wenshucha Court Judgments (remote MCP) and the official setup and paid plans. Production tools: search_judgments, get_judgment, verify_case_number and verify_quote. Legacy sample counts, tool schemas and original court-link promises do not describe production.

Related Servers

Alternatives to 文书查 / SinoVerdict MCP — Legacy Client

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • aluris-caselibrary-mcp

      alexchenlin1996-pixel
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search and retrieval of Chinese judicial cases from the Supreme People's Court case library, supporting natural language queries for similar cases, case details, filtering, and statistics.
      8
      10
      -

    • cn-law

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search mainland China's national laws, administrative and local regulations, judicial interpretations, and Supreme People's Court guiding cases, and to retrieve metadata plus the original Chinese text of individual articles or full regulations and case narratives. Results carry issuing body, promulgation and effective dates, and in-force status, with keyless access and no fabricated snippets when a document can't be read.
      102 npm
      MIT
    • 律师教你怎么做

      律师教你怎么做official

      wjorg-law
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to search roughly 4,600 Chinese legal-practice articles and guides by licensed lawyers, pinpoint and read individual provisions among 17,000+ statutes, and look up criminal charge elements, sentencing ranges, provincial compensation standards, courts, procuratorates, detention centers and other judicial resources, plus run 56 legal calculators. Responses return summaries and source links rather than full article text.
      11
      MIT

    • Korean Law MCP

      pragato-throwaway
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and analyze Korean law, including statutes, precedents, and ordinances, with citation verification and impact analysis.
      10
      3,196 npm
      MIT

    • 壹律法条 · China Law Search MCP

      tlgzs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to look up Chinese laws and statutory articles fully offline from a local SQLite database, resolving a law name plus article number to verbatim text, searching articles by keyword, and retrieving a law's chapter structure and version history. It also verifies citations in bulk, checking whether each quoted provision exists word-for-word and is currently in force.
      6
      MIT

    • mcp-las

      jaggeman
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Swedish labor law research and analysis by providing exact statute lookup, hybrid semantic and lexical search, Arbetsdomstolen case law retrieval, and collective agreement comparisons.
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools overlap in purpose (search_cases, search_judgments, browse_full_corpus, search_judgments_full all retrieve judgments but with different scopes and outputs). Descriptions are thorough but the overlap may confuse agents about which tool to use.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming patterns are mixed: some use verb_noun (search_cases, search_judgments, search_judgments_full), others use noun_noun (case_stats, case_analytics) or verb_adjective_noun (browse_full_corpus). get_case uses a different verb.

    Tool Count5/5

    7 tools is well-scoped for a legal judgment research server, covering search, detail retrieval, browsing, full-text search, and analytics without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers major operations for the domain (search, browse, full-text, analytics). Minor gaps exist (e.g., no combined labor+general search, no tool to verify source_url for full-text results), but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources