Skip to main content
Glama
jack0752168

SinoVerdict MCP Server

by jack0752168

Related Servers

Alternatives to SinoVerdict MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search and retrieval of Chinese judicial cases from the Supreme People's Court case library, supporting natural language queries for similar cases, case details, filtering, and statistics.
      8
      10
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search mainland China's national laws, administrative and local regulations, judicial interpretations, and Supreme People's Court guiding cases, and to retrieve metadata plus the original Chinese text of individual articles or full regulations and case narratives. Results carry issuing body, promulgation and effective dates, and in-force status, with keyless access and no fabricated snippets when a document can't be read.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and analyze Korean law, including statutes, precedents, and ordinances, with citation verification and impact analysis.
      10
      3,325 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Swedish labor law research and analysis by providing exact statute lookup, hybrid semantic and lexical search, Arbetsdomstolen case law retrieval, and collective agreement comparisons.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with up-to-date legal documents from official sources, enabling accurate legal information retrieval and analysis.
      18
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools overlap in purpose (search_cases, search_judgments, browse_full_corpus, search_judgments_full all retrieve judgments but with different scopes and outputs). Descriptions are thorough but the overlap may confuse agents about which tool to use.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming patterns are mixed: some use verb_noun (search_cases, search_judgments, search_judgments_full), others use noun_noun (case_stats, case_analytics) or verb_adjective_noun (browse_full_corpus). get_case uses a different verb.

    Tool Count5/5

    7 tools is well-scoped for a legal judgment research server, covering search, detail retrieval, browsing, full-text search, and analytics without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers major operations for the domain (search, browse, full-text, analytics). Minor gaps exist (e.g., no combined labor+general search, no tool to verify source_url for full-text results), but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues