Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
legal-review-agent

legal-review-agent

by jack-nolan-dev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to legal-review-agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • clio-mcp

      oktopeak
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects Claude to Clio practice management, enabling AI-assisted access to matters, contacts, documents, tasks, and billing with audit logging and encryption for law firm compliance.
      440 npm
      27
      MIT

    • LegalContext

      protomated
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables secure access to legal documents from Clio via Claude Desktop, with local processing and semantic search to ground AI responses in actual documents.
      2 npm
      29
      Mozilla Public 2.0

    • privacy-kb

      rakib-nyc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language queries about US federal and New York privacy law obligations, returning citation-anchored answers with computed deadlines, usable from Claude Desktop or the command line.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • EU Compliance & Factur-X MCP

      EroNiiChan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to classify AI systems against the EU AI Act with requirement checklists and penalty exposure, generate and validate Factur-X / EN 16931 electronic invoices, and assess GDPR and NIS2 readiness directly from the IDE. Runs as a zero-dependency Python stdio server for Claude Desktop, Cursor, and similar clients.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. The purpose of legal_review is clearly defined and distinct by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool named legal_review uses a clear, descriptive snake_case format. There are no other tools to create naming inconsistencies.

    Tool Count4/5

    One tool is on the thin side, but it is reasonably appropriate for a narrowly-scoped legal review agent. The tool is parameterized enough to handle different questions, states, and business types.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool fully covers the stated domain of evaluating legal risk for a business decision. It handles jurisdiction and business-type context and returns actionable next steps, so there are no obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources