Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ifc-viewer-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to inspect, create, and report on IFC/BIM files locally, and to open models in a viewer with BCF viewpoint support.
      5
      227 npm
      13
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables validating IFC models against IDS requirements with coverage reporting, auditing LOD by project stage, and extracting quantity take-offs, including combined audit summaries and full BIM health checks. It exposes these capabilities as MCP tools for Claude Desktop, producing Excel, HTML, and BCF reports.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to load, query, and analyze IFC building model files, including spatial structures, elements, properties, materials, and geometry.
      20
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Declarative BIM and Building-as-Code engine for AI agents: model buildings in YAML, compute deterministic QTO and cost estimations, compile to IFC4, and view interactive 3D WebGL models.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets users query, validate, convert, and compare IFC/BIM files using natural language. Runs fully locally and integrates with AI agents like Claude.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI-powered BIM tool that connects Claude to a Revit file conversion and BIM query service, enabling users to convert .rvt files to XKT, IFC, and DWG, and explore building elements through natural language.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: rule-set validation vs IDS checking, 3D viewer vs drawings pane vs 3D sketch studio, DXF reading vs FIWARE reading vs object-library search. The closest overlaps are validate_ifc vs check_ids (both 'validate a model') and the three open_* link builders, but the descriptions make the boundaries clear enough that an agent should pick correctly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case verb_noun (validate_ifc, list_validation_rules, read_dxf, search_port_library), which is predictable. Minor deviations exist: open_in_3d_viewer inserts a preposition, and the verb set mixes validate/check/open/read/list/search in ways that are not strictly parallel.

    Tool Count4/5

    Ten tools is a good size and each has a defensible role in the IFC workflow (validate, inspect rules, check IDS, view, draw, read DXF, twins, live data, objects). The surface is slightly broad for one server — the sketch studio, FIWARE reader and port library pull in adjacent domains — but nothing feels redundant.

    Completeness3/5

    Core validation, viewing, drawings and IDS delivery checking are covered, but there is no way to query or extract model content (elements, properties, quantities) or to get a link for a local file, and the digital-twin tool only lists demos rather than creating or managing twins. These gaps will force agents to fall back on external links for common follow-up questions.