Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Codex App Server MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP host to delegate work to multiple coding-agent CLIs such as Codex, Claude Code, and Antigravity as subagents, preserving native sessions and supporting team-based supervision and agent-to-agent messaging.
      17
      27 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to spawn, send input to, wait for, resume, and close provider-backed child agent sessions across Codex, Claude, and Grok adapters with configurable role presets, though it is experimental and not production-ready.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables external AI supervisors to oversee and steer native Codex through MCP, including thread and turn management, observation, interruption, approval responses, runtime status, and checkpointing.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agent managers to launch and supervise Antigravity CLI, Claude Code, CodeBuddy Code, or Grok CLI as subagents through local MCP tools for starting, waiting on, and cancelling invocations.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables launching and supervising local Codex and Claude Code agent sessions and one-shot tasks, exposing run, list, stop, and output operations over MCP with session-scoped permissions and sandbox controls.
      5
      337 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable coding assistants to delegate repository investigation, bounded implementation work, and noisy command runs (tests, builds, linters) to sandboxed OpenCode agents. Each role can use an independently selected model, and only concise results are returned to the parent agent, which keeps responsibility for architecture and high-risk operations.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools cluster into clear lifecycle, control, and observation groups. The closest pairs—agent_send/agent_steer and agent_status/agent_result—have explicit usage guidance that distinguishes them, so an agent can usually select correctly.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The agent_ prefix is consistent, but the suffix style is mixed: most tools use imperative verbs (start, send, wait), while status, events, and result are nouns, and request_resolve/goal_set reverse the expected verb-noun order. server_info also breaks the agent_ naming pattern, though reasonably for a server-level tool.

    Tool Count5/5

    Fifteen tools is on the higher end but fits the complexity of orchestrating background agent workers. Each tool covers a distinct lifecycle, observation, or control function, and none feels redundant or unnecessary.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full agent lifecycle: start, resume, fork, guide, interrupt, observe, wait, collect results, resolve requests, set goals, and archive. There are no obvious dead ends, and every state change has a corresponding way to inspect or move forward.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues