Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Codex App Server MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP host to delegate work to multiple coding-agent CLIs such as Codex, Claude Code, and Antigravity as subagents, preserving native sessions and supporting team-based supervision and agent-to-agent messaging.
      17
      13 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables a lead AI agent to spawn and coordinate manager agents, which can in turn run child agents across Codex/ChatGPT, Google Antigravity, Claude Code, and local OpenAI-compatible models. Provides messaging, waiting, transcripts, file exchange, and saved-conversation adoption so multi-agent workflows can be orchestrated from MCP hosts.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to spawn, send input to, wait for, resume, and close provider-backed child agent sessions across Codex, Claude, and Grok adapters with configurable role presets, though it is experimental and not production-ready.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables external AI supervisors to oversee and steer native Codex through MCP, including thread and turn management, observation, interruption, approval responses, runtime status, and checkpointing.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables a host coding agent to launch and coordinate real subagent sessions in other agent CLIs and accounts, sharing existing MCP servers, skills, plugins, and instructions. Supports two-way messaging, automatic account failover, and mixed-CLI delegation while leaving credentials with the vendor CLIs.
      8
      11
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables a coding agent to act as a master that spawns, dispatches tasks to, monitors, and approves heterogeneous worker agents over ACP, exposing the orchestration lifecycle as MCP tools.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools cluster into clear lifecycle, control, and observation groups. The closest pairs—agent_send/agent_steer and agent_status/agent_result—have explicit usage guidance that distinguishes them, so an agent can usually select correctly.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The agent_ prefix is consistent, but the suffix style is mixed: most tools use imperative verbs (start, send, wait), while status, events, and result are nouns, and request_resolve/goal_set reverse the expected verb-noun order. server_info also breaks the agent_ naming pattern, though reasonably for a server-level tool.

    Tool Count5/5

    Fifteen tools is on the higher end but fits the complexity of orchestrating background agent workers. Each tool covers a distinct lifecycle, observation, or control function, and none feels redundant or unnecessary.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full agent lifecycle: start, resume, fork, guide, interrupt, observe, wait, collect results, resolve requests, set goals, and archive. There are no obvious dead ends, and every state change has a corresponding way to inspect or move forward.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues