obs-get-group-list
Retrieves all groups in OBS Studio, enabling you to inspect available scene groups before managing or controlling them.
Instructions
Gets an array of all groups in OBS
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieves all groups in OBS Studio, enabling you to inspect available scene groups before managing or controlling them.
Gets an array of all groups in OBS
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses only that the result is an array of all groups — nothing about ordering, whether an empty array is returned when no groups exist, or whether connection/auth to OBS must already be established.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single front-loaded sentence with zero waste. It is efficient, though its brevity is the same quality that leaves the behavioral gaps above.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a no-parameter list tool with no output schema, the description is minimally adequate but stops short of describing the returned array's contents (group names? ids?) or what it means for an OBS group to exist — details an agent needs to chain into follow-up calls.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate; the baseline of 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Specific verb + resource: 'Gets an array of all groups in OBS'. An agent can tell this is the group enumerator rather than the sibling obs-get-group-scene-items, though the description never says so explicitly and doesn't clarify that 'groups' are scene groups.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of alternatives such as obs-get-scene-list or obs-get-group-scene-items. The agent must infer from the name alone that this is the discovery step before calling group-item or scene-item tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.