pg_uptime
Retrieve PostgreSQL server uptime and start time to monitor database availability and runtime.
Instructions
Show server uptime and start time.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| target | Yes | Target name from ~/.dbx/targets/ |
Retrieve PostgreSQL server uptime and start time to monitor database availability and runtime.
Show server uptime and start time.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| target | Yes | Target name from ~/.dbx/targets/ |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. Only says 'Show' – assumes read-only, but doesn't confirm idempotency, required connection state, or side effects. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence, no wasted words. Front-loaded with purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read-only tool, description is adequate but missing details about return format (no output schema). Could mention output includes timestamp or uptime duration.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameter (target) with clear description. Tool description adds no extra meaning beyond schema. Baseline 3 maintained.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Show server uptime and start time' – a specific verb and resource. Among sibling tools, this is distinct from query, connect, etc. No ambiguity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this vs alternatives (e.g., pg_connection_status, pg_version). Lacks context about prerequisites or typical scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/itunified-io/mcp-postgres'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server