oracle_linux_kernel_modules

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry all behavioral info. It states the output includes size, dependencies, and use count, implying a read-only query. However, it does not explicitly declare it as read-only, nor mention any potential side effects or required permissions. Adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is clear and efficient. Could be slightly more structured (e.g., listing output fields separately) but not wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description specifies output fields, which compensates for missing output schema. However, it lacks any context about when to use, prerequisites, or relationship to other tools. Minimal viable completeness for a simple query tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. The description does not elaborate on parameter usage or format. Baseline 3 is appropriate but no additional value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly indicates the tool lists loaded kernel modules with specific properties (size, dependencies, use count). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'oracle_linux_kernel_info' (general info) and 'oracle_linux_kernel_parameters' (parameters). Missing an explicit verb like 'list' but otherwise strong.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Does not mention what distinguishes it from other kernel-related tools or any prerequisites. Agent receives no context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.